All posts by objvst

Philosophy

Vladimir Putin is Stupid

Leave a comment

He has attacked Ukraine to gain a sea port and farm land. Oddly, the people he is killing look just like him. The people he is making deals with; the Chinese and the Muslims do not look like him but worse the moment they can attack him. They will destroy him and end the existence of Russia. The enemies Putin has all look like him. Putin declared enemies are the Europeans and Americans. 

His declared enemies have a genetic link to Putin and would like to team with him against all the other threats in the world. Yet Putin only sees what is in the immediate gain not long term for Russia and the Russian people, just his personal evil shallow dictates. Unless he changes his view he along with the other dictators will be tossed in the same trash heap of history.. 

So if Putin aligned himself with Europe and the Americans he would not need to destroy Ukraine to use the land he could just sign a contract, get better roads developed and get access to seaports. The goodwill between Russia and Ukraine, Russia and Europe, Russia and America would make him far wealthier than he is capable of imagining because he can’t see beyond evil colored glasses. 

The Chinese and Iran are so happy to be using Putin to do their dirty work. The more of his kind he kills the more they love it. Sun Tzu, Never interfere with an enemy in the process of destroying himself. So Chinese and Muslims laugh while Putin destroys their enemy knowing in the long term he is destroying his allies for future Russian survival. 

Like other evil dictators Putin will never learn that if he wants to be truly great he must give his people freedom, individual rights, and property ownership so as the country economically rises so will his greatness and historical significance. He will not be exiled to the trash heap but notarized as the greatest Russian leader. So as smart as he is he really is a dump shit hurting his own prospects and mankind only to usher in the Dark Ages II. 

Education, Health, Politics, Socialism

Sarah Silverman insults Caitlyn Jenner for being against Trans participation in womens sports.

Leave a comment

https://www.dailywire.com/news/sarah-silverman-calls-caitlyn-jenner-a-t-promotes-transgenders-in-girls-sports?utm_campaign=dw_newsletter&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=126072706&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_EAQP7DZUUq55rc3PCdLVnHsCURYY-UHeae3NBnfmqr2tVl5oCxkUYslHgV98-32fw_BFlfesBYtfRLRbLQNbV_BP7FQ&utm_content=non_insiders&utm_source=housefile

if link is broken, summary of what she said is below.

My Comments to Sarah Silverman,
Sarah, bubala, you want examples, girls sports are being destroyed by men pretending to be girls. They can’t change their biology by wearing a dress. You are not protecting girls by protecting self-proclaimed genders. Self-proclaimed genders are not genders. They are feelings and have no place in women’s sports. If it were true then men should start competing in women’s pro tennis by self-proclamation (No medical examination required, unless by a quack) and women’s tennis would be over and the big money they were earning would be gone. Why not have self-proclaimed women in the WNBA because all the women would be gone. The ratings may go up if men competed because it’s a better product. We could call it the G-League Plus. Doing this America would appear as fools to the rest of the world.

So Sarah, if I tell you I’m an apple would you eat me and pretend your a vegetarian, not a cannibal? Just because someone declares they are trans does not physically change their gender. A doctor can examine the self-proclaimed trans and it still would not change their gender. Don’t ever pretend you are pro-women if you continue to be pro-trans in women’s sports. You can’t have it both ways.

You are protecting Marxism, not women. Stop puking the party line. The goal of Marxism is destroying identity so the state will provide it to you and easily manipulate you. Don’t be a fool, or useful idiot, like your husband. Too late!


Summary from The Daily Wire article.
Comedian Sarah Silverman advocated for biological males who identify as female to be allowed to participate in girls’ and women’s sports.

The comedian also called California gubernatorial candidate Caitlyn Jenner, formerly Bruce Jenner, a “t***” for acknowledging biological differences and advocating the separation of sports by biology instead of gender identity. Silverman even suggested Jenner, who is transgender, is transphobic.

“I saw Caitlyn Jenner saying trans girls should not play girls sports,” said Silverman. “Caitlyn, you’re a woman, right? A trans girl is a girl, she should have the same rights as cis girls.”

Earlier this month, Jenner told TMZ that the separation of biological males and females in sports comes down to “fairness.”

“That’s why I oppose biological boys who are trans competing in girls’ sports in school,” the former Olympic gold medalist said. “It just isn’t fair and we have to protect girls’ sports in our schools.”

“If you think a trans girl — what, you think a trans girl is too strong?” Silverman continued. “What about tall girls as opposed to short girls? What about boys in high school who are teeny tiny and their teammates have already hit puberty and are shaving? Why don’t you just have co-ed sports divided by weight or height, ya know? This is so dumb.”

Contrary to Silverman’s argument, numerous studies (and any life experience) confirms the biological differences between males and females, such as the structure and size of our bones, lung capacity, and muscle strength.

As highlighted by The Daily Wire, for example, “[a] study in the Journal of Applied Physiology shows that men have approximately 40% greater upper body strength and 33% greater lower body strength than women on average. Overall, women have somewhere between 37-68% the muscle strength of men.”

Moreover, a recent study confirmed the biological athletic advantages men have over women even after one year of hormone therapy, which many LGBT activists claim would level the playing field for girls. The study can be looked at here.

“They are legislating this s*** without one single example of how this plays out,” Silverman claimed.

Of course, this is not true, either. There are numerous examples of biological girls being bested by biological males who identify as female. Here are just five examples, compiled by The Daily Wire.

“This is not worrying about girls sports, believe me,” Silverman said, arguing that the acknowledgment of biological differences is just a cover for “transphobia.”

“I think there are better ways to worry about girls sports. This is not worrying about — this is not what that is, this is not concern for girls sports. It’s transphobia, full stop.”

“It’s just such a bummer when such a prominent trans woman is such a t***,” she added, referencing Jenner.

Education, Politics

College professor won’t call cops, Branden Ellis calls cops Heroes

Leave a comment

The professor is from Cypress College in Southern California. Currently on leave.

Dialogue from Zoom call transcribed best as I could because at many times they were speaking over each other.


Professor: You brought up the Police in your speech a few times. What is your main concern? The issue is systemic because the whole reason we have Police departments in the first place, where did it stem from? What is their history? It stems from people in the South wanting to capture runaway slaves.
Jeremy: Maybe they shouldn’t be heroes, maybe they don’t belong on a kids show?
Branden: I disagree with Jeremy: I think Cops are heroes and happen to have a difficult job.
Professor: All of them?
Branden: I’d say a good majority of them. You have bad people in every business
Professor: a lot of police officers have committed atrocious crimes and gotten away with it and have never been convicted of any of it. And I think for the person who has family members who are Police officers
Branden: Yes, I understand. This is what I believe. This is my opinion. This is not popular to say. I do support our Police and we have bad people and those who do bad things should be brought to justice. I agree with that.
Professor: They haven’t!
Branden: I agree with you on that point, they should.
Professor: So what is your bottom line point? Your saying Police officers should be revered, view as heroes?
Branden: I think they are heroes, in a sense, because they come to your need and they come and help you, and they have problems like every other business. We should fix that.
Professor: It’s not a business. That’s a problem looking at it as a business. They’re actually here to protect and to serve the people, not help them.
Branden: Who do we call when we’re in trouble and someone has a knife or a gun
Professor, I wouldn’t call the Police.
Branden: Why wouldn’t you call the Police?
Professor, I don’t trust them. My life’s in more danger in their presence.
Branden: Professor who would you call?
Professor, I wouldn’t call anybody.
Branden: If someone intrudes into your house would you have a gun on you? Who would you call?
Professor: No,
Professor: Time to go. I’m not going to reach out to the Police.
Jeremy: If someone comes at you with a gun it’s to late for the police to do anything about it.
Branden: I know it’s not popular for me to say that to you guys and people in here but that’s what I believe and thanks for listening to my point.
Jeremy: I’m glad you did say that even though I do disagree with it. It’s important.
Branden: We should fight for the right for people to say things we don’t even like.
Jeremy: I may not agree with what you say but I will fight for your right to say, within some extent!
Branden: Amen, brother.

COMMENTS

The most infuriating the Professor said is where cops began, It stems from people in the South wanting to capture runaway slaves. How ignorant is that. Police have existed in many forms in many societies for thousands of years. Making it only a racial issue is disgusting. She should be fired for her incompetence.

The only part which I am in agreement with the Professor is, she should not call the cops during times of perilous danger.

Jeremy the third participant in the dialogue said one important thing wrong. I learned this in elementary school in the 1960s. “I disagree with what you say but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.” Originally attributed to Voltaire. The other saying I learned just as important, “Sticks and Stones may break my bones but names can never hurt me.”
Now it ends, name’s will destroy me. That means people today instead of having backbone are infantile being afflicted by names. The hate crime laws infantilized an entire race of people while putting others on notice that free speech is dead. All derogatory names must be okay to say and people who may not like those names must know violence is a criminal act and punishable. It creates a better society because instead of people holding back what they think they will say it and others will know where they stand. It’s a huge benefit for all. In that people find a way to get along as each stands up for themselves and verbally fights back.

A more complete video

Politics, Socialism

dON’T PACK THE COURTS, FIRE A JUDGE

Leave a comment

Democrats want to pack the court. FDR tried it but even Democrats at the time rejected it. Why pack the courts? So presidents can appoint political hacks who support their policies in practice ending any descent from an opposing party. This also becomes a free-for-all to backstop any lower court decisions oppressing American Rights becoming a form of dictatorship where court decisions are centrally planned by the controlling political party instead of on it’s own merits, erasing the Bill of Rights. Instead of packing the court just remove judges you don’t like and replace them with preferred judges. The goal here is once the courts are packed Democrats believe they will wrench control away from the Republicans forever.

One step they took prior is fixing the 2020 election using Dominion Voting Systems to manipulate votes in favor of Joe Biden. If Democrats can control elections and the Supreme Court they will always fill the chambers of Congress and be able to tax, regulate and oppress Americans. Peter Navarro put together a report identifying the fraud called T H E – I M M A C U L A T E – D E C E P T I O N: Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities The Navarro Report

Instead of packing the courts just change policy to fire judges and appoint hacks. The problem is you need a two-thirds vote of Congress to change the Constitution so representative and senators just ignore it and pass laws to override it anyway. Once the precedent is set it carries forward. Just like Democrats wanted to remove Donald Trump from having the nuclear codes to start a war when it’s the job of Congress to declare war but refuses to vote for it leaving presidents to blame if anything goes wrong.

Before the 2022 midterm election Republicans must in all cities scrutinize voting machines, file lawsuits against their cities using any kind of fraudulent voting methods so we have free and fair future elections.

Yet if Democrats can’t get the fix in all aspects of government than Republicans must reverse everything and go even further if they gain power and strengthen the U.S. Constitution making it harder to change.

We have battle ahead!

Capitalism, Economics, Health, Socialism

COVID-19 PANDEMIC SOLUTION

Leave a comment

Politicians go out to eat while closing most small business restaurants so most Americans can’t. Governors & Mayors allow for outside eating in enclosed tents (like eating inside) yet the enclosed restaurant which protects customer from the weather is not allowed, nuts. They make restaurants to put up costly barriers only to close them down. They don’t even have proof that restaurants are a problem refusing to disclose it.

Those most susceptible to death by Covid-19 are people over 50 to 80+ rates respectively increasing 2% up to 15%. Those under 50 rarely die from the disease. The key is separating those over 50 from those under 50 in families, businesses; workers and customers. Families & businesses should separate by age the overs and unders with open times allocated for each.

Those most susceptible to death -over 50- should get the vaccine first and those under as needed.

Government thinks being dictators are caring but destroying peoples jobs & the small businesses they work in so their job disappears, puts employees in debt with no way to pay it back. Finally, raising taxes so they can’t pay any debts back becoming slaves to the government is evil. This is a Socialist Communist experiment gone wrong in America, Evil.

Health

COVID-19, china flu, kung flu

Leave a comment

Are the government’s actions more harmful than the Covid-19 pandemic? Didn’t hear much of anything when the H1N1 influenza pandemic occurred in 2009 during Obama presidency. In 2012 CDC calculated H1N1 deaths at 284,000 worldwide. 201,000 respiratory and 83,000 cardiovascular disease associated. 20% of the deaths were people over 64. Covid-19 in the first 5 months had 16,559 deaths. H1N1 did not adversely affect the elderly.

A follow-up study done in September 2010 showed that the risk of serious illness resulting from the 2009 H1N1 flu was no higher than that of the yearly seasonal flu. Are the Covid-19 infections no higher than seasonal flu?

Since Covid-19 is mostly harmful to people over 64, and young people are least affected then so long as young people keep their distance from the elderly eventually this will pass. Economic shutdown not necessary. One thing to do like many businesses have store access separation like only elderly first couple hours of being open and rest of day for youth or set up as appropriate for each business. We could start the economic engine of America so better care can be offered to the afflicted. This is my estimation, not a medical professional, just a math nerd.

What other actions are the govt doing to deal with it. They have decided to do new rounds of QE Quantitative Easing. This is to print money. Give it to those who have not earned it. Giving freshly printed money to individuals and businesses to pay their bills while they have been laid off or shut down to a degree because the govt has stopped much commerce. The amount of QE they are talking about 2-4 trillion is insane.

So we are going to print money without producing anything? What gives money value are the goods and services we produce. If all we product is money we produce nothing! This is the danger. We are destroying the dollar sooner rather than later. When other countries stop sending us goods for inflated dollars and use that money to keep us afloat by buying US Treasuries the game is over. The money sits in America so all we have is runaway inflation.

The printed dollars that are overseas will start flooding back to America by competing with Americans to buy up all of our goods and services causing prices to skyrocket. Empty shelves, long lines until Americans start producing its own goods and we go back to real money based on a gold standard which would be easy with all the computer automation.

Economics

WHAT IS BITCOIN? 

Leave a comment

BitCoin is not a currency. BitCoin is a vehicle for exchanging value. A BitCoin has no value nor does it even exist until someone deposits fiat currency or transfers it into an exchange. So BitCoin is a payment system.

The problem arises when the payment system changes into a BitCoin system based on irrational faith. BitCoin’s value is dependent on the current value of that currency plus BitCoin acts like a stock where the perceived value increases its price to irrational levels.

BitCoin is a Beanie Baby Currency. People could exchange higher values of Beanie Babies for more goods until the price of beanie babies drops to nothing where they can be used as a cloth to clean toilets.

Capitalism, Politics, Socialism

Capitalism vs Socialism in a Disaster

Leave a comment
People freely helping people in time of a disaster is neither Socialism or Capitalism. It is a moral choice of individuals. Socialism is forced help by taking products or services from one person and giving them to another. Usually not fairly because the greedy politicians keep a bunch for themselves and distribute a pittance to the people. Capitalism rejects redistribution of wealth and demands personal responsibility to earn your own keep and Right to keep what’s earned, choice of how to transact your property, to buy what you want, give it to someone in need, not a moocher.
In a disaster situation in a Socialist country people let government handle things because they cannot earn enough, nor have property rights so have nothing to give others.  People today starving in Venezuela even to the point of eating zoo animals.  Owning a boat is a luxury, a car is a luxury only for the elite few.  A disaster in a Capitalist country people have property ownership and will have a boat, car or supplies to help others because they don’t have to wait in line at the Socialist market when the grocery truck arrives.  In a Capitalist country people are able to help others while in a Socialist country people have little wealth or property to do so.
A Socialist system is driven by greed because leadership keeps their unearned hoards the peoples production wealth by using temperance. Give the people enough food not to starve but not so little food where they up-rise against the leadership.  Meanwhile Leadership can sell extra crops for profit outside the country to fill their greed further of the unearned.
Capitalism gives people property rights so earning a living based on your own efforts is far more moral than a Socialist government giving an allowance to a janitor, chemist, or doctor all the same.  This demotivates productive efforts for an ordinary person to seek a better life.  Earning your own keep is not greed but being earnest, otherwise extortion of wealth by government from people is greedy in an evil way because it wasn’t earned.
Only evil greedy people don’t think its fair that someone has more money than them even if they worked hard for every penny.  So who is greedier the person who earned it or the person with the something for nothing mentality who thinks he has a right to it without earning it or by voting for government to use force to take it?
So in a Capitalist country people will assist you in a disaster because their wealth allows for compassion and resources to help but in a Socialist country everyone is in the same misery loves company boat.
Politics

Senator Ted Cruz destroy’s his political career.

Leave a comment

Senator Ted Cruz blew it. Understand that Donald Trump insulted his father and wife. That is unforgiveable. Ted Cruz did not think outside of the box. His anger, emotions drove his choice not to endorse Donald Trump. What about the bigger picture. He let down the Republican Party but does that really matter because they have let down the Republican voters for years. Letting down the Party is meaningless. He did let down the Republican Voters. Ted did not need to endorse Trump because he is the best conservative candidate because he is not. He just needed to endorse Trump because we can’t let Hillary become President.

Ted could have endorsed Donald if he said, “Hillary Clinton will continue the attack on individual freedoms we enjoy in America. Hillary will appoint Supreme Court Justices that will destroy America’s freedoms for the next 50 years. Hillary will make deals with foreign leaders to pad her pockets and endanger America.  Hillary will let immigrants in America who will be a threat to all Americans. Because we have to take a stand against four more years of a Democratic Presidency I endorse Donald Trump as the next President of the United States.”

As the real Conservative Ted Cruz could have seen beyond the insults and protected his family and children against a Democratic Presidency which will remove any Individual Rights his future family needed to live free & prosper but instead decided to protect his family in the short term only to damn their future.

What Ted Cruz did not understand is he had no chance for the Presidency. Donald Trump did all the heavy lifting is his Platform for the Presidency. The Borders which Ted would have never brought up on his own because he would not have defended himself well from being called a racist only to get 1% or fewer primary votes. The keeping Syrian Muslims out until we can have a method to vet potential terrorists would also not do in fear of being called racist.  Also Donald Trump did the heavy lifting removing the Rhino Republicans which Ted Cruz could not do. Ted falsely thinks coming in second is his own accomplishment not realizing Trump paved his way.

Now Ted thinks he has a future in 2020, after letting down himself, his family and the Constitutional, freedom fighting, Americans’.  Ted made a huge mistake. In 2020 if Trump is president he must wait until 2024 at which time Mike Pence will be the GOP Presidential Candidate. So Ted must wait until 2028 or 2032 at which time because of his petulant traitorous decision in 2016 will never become president.

Ted can still redeem himself if he comes out Monday, before the DNC and conditionally supports Donald Trump as I wrote.  Please Ted redeem yourself because I voted for you in the Primary.

Politics, Socialism

After Barack Obama’s Presidency Jan 20, 2017

Leave a comment

When Barack Obama exits the office of the Presidency on January 20, 2017 he will live in a home in Washington D.C. Unlike previous presidents who go back to their home states living is self chosen obscurity as not to conflict with the current President in respect of Office and its challenging position.

Well Barack Obama most likely chose to live in Washington D.C. so he can support the Democratic president or criticize the Republican President. I think the Democratic President may like some support yet rather have it quietly over a phone call not in public. Similarly but opposite I think the Republican President would not like a former opposing party president commenting on current issue being dealt with and raising the ire of the public against his every decision.  

Now if Barack Obama was morally sound and pro-America and Donald Trump morally suspect and Anti-American Barack would be commenting from the high-ground.  Yet, Barack Obama is caught up in his Colonialist, Socialist Idealism nothing anyone has said during his presidency or will say after that will make any of his positions Pro-American. Its hard to believe that every single decision he has made is Anti-American, or some would say he hates American, ergo Colonialist.  

So what can a Republican President do to deal with such a dissenting voice? He can have a private conversation telling the former president, “Remember all those scandals you blocked investigation on so you could get Hillary Clinton get elected and looked above all the fray. Well, I am going to have my Attorney General prosecute all your underlings and yourself until you are comfortably in prison. So do you want to avoid all the prosecution or not? Keep in mind that does not mean I will not prosecute anything. Some criminal activities the public has a right to know.   Since you are not going to respect the office of the presidency like all previous presidents I am not going to let you get away with all the crimes you have committed.